Lies, damn lies, you know the drill
Friday, March 20th, 2009 10:45 amSomeone pointed out http://www.livejournal.com/stats.bml on IRC, which has a strange outlier for age 29.
Strange outlier wasn't there a year ago! http://web.archive.org/web/20080312210339/http://www.livejournal.com/stats.bml
What's going on?
(I suspect someone targeted the year 1980 as a nice round number that's above 18. But... but. Now my curiosity is itching.)
Strange outlier wasn't there a year ago! http://web.archive.org/web/20080312210339/http://www.livejournal.com/stats.bml
What's going on?
(I suspect someone targeted the year 1980 as a nice round number that's above 18. But... but. Now my curiosity is itching.)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 03:01 am (UTC)I suppose it could also be a lot of minors with old journals/no init_birthdates changing their birthdates so they'd show up as over-18, but the timing is *off* (should have been apparent more than a year ago, if that), and the numbers are too high.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 03:24 am (UTC)I kind of like the idea of a short-term solution that makes it harder for people who are born in 1980 to register.
How hilarious would that be?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 04:02 am (UTC)I like this line of thinking. It could help!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 07:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 08:35 pm (UTC)Obviously, or at least obviously to me, the best protection is actual protection, not easy to workaround blocks.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-20 08:36 pm (UTC)I didn't actually mean that as a good idea.