Question about LJ
Monday, September 24th, 2007 02:35 pmIf there is a feature of LiveJournal (the software - not the business) that you would love to use but can't, or have trouble using, because it's poorly designed, confusing, unreliable, or not worth using because it makes you jump through unnecessary hoops, what is it, how do you think it should work instead, and why?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 02:11 am (UTC)LJ used to limit number of characters in the CSS box, it doesn't anymore, AFAIK.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 02:38 am (UTC)It seems like only 17KB is accepted at this point by the LJ system. And the style from
can be combined into:#content-inner {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#alpha-inner {
margin: 0;
padding:0;
}
#content-inner, #alpha-inner {
margin: 0;
padding:0;
}
And many more tips to optimize the code, however I (cliche) don't have the time now.
And the fact that the CSS itself is already 23KB, it makes more sense to host it in ripway.com. Why? Because browser will store the CSS file in a cache and will access that instead of opening a HTML file (your LJ) + 23KB extra baggage, every *single* time. Saving time and bandwidth in your part (and people with limited internet access) and less burden on LJ server.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 02:56 am (UTC)Which is why I struggle for a year to come up with my current layout in
This tool (http://flumpcakes.co.uk/css/optimiser/) shrunk the file to 18KB, but they don't groups selectors with the same declarations. And those image replacement CSS can be simplified too.
I wish you good luck! ;-)